The Front has the majority in both chambers and is capable of simply and iron party discipline - as it always has - of passing laws that please him.
The exception was the former President's veto of that identity Tabare Vazquez who vetoed the national legislature in an attempt to decriminalize abortion . ( If it's digression this policy two weeks ago was adamant vehemently arguing with supreme microphone at a public event that the rule of human rights in the Lower House should continue the process begun in the Senate to vote on the Expiry Interpretaitva Act to extinguish it. Now, yesterday, from Montevideo was called Mujica = Astori, the two Presidents of Uruguay, Russia where he is to accompany the "reverse". In cartwheel chameleon versatility ideological color = = = pragmatic utilitarian accompany not vote. Anything goes)
However the particular case marras hits possibility that stubborn and stupid annulling two plebiscites - 1989 and 2009 - reaffirmed the legal health of revocation, precisely those instruments of direct democracy that the Frente Amplio was used successfully when opposition and clear way that opened since 2004 to reach the Central Branch of Uruguay.
Uruguayan jurists also senior professor, are answered in pronouncing that the Parliament has no power or repeal by the brake competition imposed by the Constitution, with Article 331, one of the most significant. Amen specialists are almost relish a projection of the disorders and paternalistic legal chaos that was created by the confusing and harmful additives that generate multiple alleged act.
attitude is striking because it has the presidential veto power, but released few days ago inappropriate words - up for any elementary political strategist who boasts of its status as a low- wisdom saying that "never would amend Parliament's disposal. "
never say never in politics! ... except that then go to sad and graciously ask others to take what is a power that the Republican Constitution - the veto- assigned to the Executive branch in the person of an elected president.
theorists of constitutional law the Uruguay qualify as typical presidential country by the supreme powers of its truly "president". However, Mujica is encouraged.
But more shocking, surprising and disappointing, is the argument used, in one extreme of meanness devoid of high ethics, to summarize it risks losing the upcoming elections. He said this made the newspaper El Pais of Montevideo date:
- "Do not come to ask you not to vote, but I feel the need, more that as president, as part of the political, to say that this is a wrong way,
"Do not come looking for political gain, I am worried about the future of the Frente Amplio. There is no argument that can be used in campaign to rebut the fact that overlook two plebiscites. This law commits the future of the Front in the government.
"Do not mix discussion of the interpretive project hatred
"If you vote it will be reflected in the next election."
Uruguay.Ojalá Poor people save him for a country that is not sitting, which before the Frente Amplio opposition language used in defendant who was "muscle-flexing" because of the orientation of the traditional parties, now in the minority. It's bad time to be now sitting in upright postures demanding world, where a chair seat may not be worth more than the democratic sovereignty by first importing plebiscite where get unique buttocks before the Republican common consciousness.
For the most dramatic anthology of the country's political expressions have been heard, trying to suggest behaviors to legislators so cheap and ignoble reasons :".... chairs They are worth votes "
0 comments:
Post a Comment